Social Stratification Essays -- Papers

Inequalities exist in solely types of human society. Even in the simplest cultures where variations in wealth or proportion are non-existent, there are inequalities between single(a)s, men and women, the young and the old. A person may have a higher status than others because of a intermiticular prowness at hunting, for instance, or because he or she is believed to have limited access to the ancestral spirits. To imbibe inequalities, sociologists speak of Social stratification. Social genial stratification lies at the core of society and of the discipline of sociology. Social inequality is a fundamental aspect of virtually all-social processes and a persons position in the stratification system is the most consistent predictor of his/her behaviour, attitudes, and life chances. Social Stratification is a characteristic of society, not simply a reflection of individual differences. Social Stratification persists over generations. Social Stratification is universal besides n ot variable. It involves not only inequality but also beliefs. It is usable to think of stratification as rather like the geological layering of list in the earths surface, Societies can be seen as consisting of strata in a hierarchy, with the to a greater extent favoured at the top and the less privileged at the bottom. If we look mainstay at the year 1912, when the Titanic sank, we can make a radio link with social inequality for the look people lived back then. When we watched the blockbuster mangle in 1997, we were shown how much of an impact that social inequality had on the pull down class passengers. Women and children had the highest survival rate. Those who held a first class ticket, more than 60% of those survived because their cabins were on the upper decks. Only 1/3 of the third cla... ...ibility, and tho imperfectly measured in the existing social classification. Of course, we recognise that in contemporary society, people are less likely spontaneously to desc ribe their own experiences in the language of class. They search for more direct and detail determinants of their life chances to put alongside their recognition of class, and they recognise the independent part played by age, gender, and ethnicity. We do not, then, live in a classless society, though we do live in a society whose members no hourlong spontaneously and unambiguously use the language of class as the obvious, taken-for-granted way of describing social inequalities. Class is not dead, but perhaps the monolithic social imagery of class has, indeed, had its day. It is this, which makes our society a functional one, and what will sponsor shape it to be a stronger one in the future.