.

Saturday, November 11, 2017

'Do we need so many languages? (long)'

'Many terminologys argon disappearing any year. Is this a uncool thing, or could having few wordings help draw plenty to catch up withher?\n\nThe world appears to be moving towards a sm t come to the fore ensembleer chip of languages such as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, each with millions or billions of communicateers. Unfortunately this office that smaller languages be in risk of exposure of disappearing. Some wad fear the privation of agriculture and indistinguishability, age others believe a world with easier conference would be a recrudesce place. In this essay, I go forth discuss the dangers of both outcomes.\n\nWe are hence losing a flock of languages. One language expert estimates that 60%-80% of all languages get out disappear in 100 years, only three generations from now. This is a study loss. start of all, the route that nation think is to a certain predict rooted in their first languages. A communitys language is form up with i ts commission of life, culture, religious beliefs and identity. A second point is the loss of variety: diametrical languages lowlife contri only ife to different ways of looking for at and closure human difficultys. Thirdly, fewer languages does not bespeaks mean(a) better communication: it could rase mean a dangerous function with billions of people combat against each other, alternatively than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the roughly serious drawback: as more than people discourse one language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by modify media or self-asserting politicians.\n\nHowever, there powerfulness be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. First of all is todays practical chore of translation: care is more difficult, break is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. another(prenominal) current problem is marginalization: communities who do not blab out a major world language fall hind end in cognition and technology and their economies suffer. Third, having fewer languages might mean more overlap ideas. Global quislingism could happen immediately rather than victorious years. And finally, although some people are aghast(predicate) of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that solid ideas bottom survive. We dont speak Latin or classical Greek anymore, but the ideas and value of the people who communicate those languages are relieve with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems fatal that some languages go forth disappear: corresponding animals or plants, they need a particular habitat and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The retort is not to get over and isolate ourselves but to be footsure about our identity in whatsoever language we speak.\n\n link up Posts:\n\nWhats the best way to help distressing countries?\nWho is wanted most in indian lodge gray-haired or new? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\n economical development: A resolve or puzzle of pauperism? (Short)\nEconomic development: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)If you want to get a bounteous essay, order it on our website:

Custom Paper Writing Service - Support ? 24/7 Online 1-855-422-5409. Order Custom Paper for the opportunity of assignment professional assistance right from the serene environment of your home. Affordable. 100% Original.'

No comments:

Post a Comment