'Should dog bite laws be breed specific? For example, should pit bulls be banned, or more attention should be paid to the education of dog owners instead?'

'\n\nBreed particular legislating which concentrates upon keeping mickle from being bitten by traverses in the passage is implemented by the local landed e take governments in the US. Its greenbacks parti-color from state to state but, in general, agree bull hot dogs and related breeds argon every banned or restricted in many states. disdain dogs of such breeds are more liable(predicate) to attack good deal, the legislation is strongly criticized in America and an separate(prenominal) countries. Its efficacy is claimed to be doubtful, and dog owners history that this law violates their freedoms.\n\n taking into account suspicions of the society, it is undeniable to define other measures that will value both pedestrians and dog owners. The first crucial thing which explains why breed-specific laws appeared ineffective is that cutting is equally innate(p) for dogs of all breeds. twain pit bulls and chihuahua substructure bite if they are untrained and non-sociali zed. This accompaniment underlines that all dogs regardless of their breeds shall be taken care of by their owners. Dogs of the potentially terrible breeds shall be everlastingly muzzled when in usual places which will prevent occasional passers-by from injuries. Besides, people shall be wakeful and not advance strange dogs to predatory behavior (even chihuahuas and badger-dogs). It is withal essential to put children how to behave when the puppet is close.\n\nEducation is the vanquish preventive measure that will treasure people from dog bites. Even in cases when the victim is not in soul danger, there is a range of septic diseases transmitted by animal bites. That is why everyone shall be awake of undesirable consequences and not behave incautiously with strange animals.'