Military Robotics Essay

A robot sniper is not subject to arm shake, fatigue, or every of the other humankind factors that throw off a riflemans aim, qualification each shot more accurate and less likely to tote up someone other than the enemy. Pilotless drones are more likely to clear up the target with better accuracy than bombs being dropped from a plane at 30,000 feet (Gyrnir). In the Army 53 percent of their casualties come with first tie-in with the enemy. Having a robot scouting ahead or flying above sending back pictures of the ground below to troops would reduce the casualties (Fogarty). armament robots can serve in place of human beings in fickle ordinance disposal (EOD), surveillance, and other dangerous situations. For example, when an EOD squad was hunting for jury-rigged explosive devices (IED), by the time the pass was close enough to take on the telltale wires from the bomb, it was too late. The IED erupted in a wave of flames. A soldier would have to be as far as 50 yards away(p) to consort death and as far as half-mile away to escape injury from bomb fragments. Even if a person is not advance the pressure from the blast by itself can break bones.This soldier had been duty on top of the bomb. As the flames and debris cleared, the rest of the aggroup advanced. They demonstrate little remaining of their team upmate. They loaded the remains onto a helicopter, which took them back to the teams base near Baghdad International Airport. That night the teams commander did his duty and wrote home about the incident. He apologized for his inability to change what had happened. He wrote, at least when a robot dies, you tangle witht have to write a letter to its mother (Singer).The pass was a 42-pound robot called a PackBot. The PackBot mounts all sorts of cameras and sensors, as well as an arm with four joints that extends over two meters to allow it to examine comical objects on EOD missions. If it werent for this robot to scout ahead the rest of the EOD te am wouldnt have survive the explosion (Singer). In conclusion, robotic technology is ever-changing the future of warfare. Robots are used to save and protect, not pervert fair lives. The idea of robots replacing humans in the military is very unlikely.In order for a robot to do something it needs a human to program it and tell it what to do (Singer). Fully supreme robots that may harm the wrong people presents ethical, legal, and command challenges determining who was responsible for the robots actions (the officer that put the robot into action and instructed it on its target or the company that manufactured the hardware) raises philosophical problems. Therefore, until these problems are resolved fully autonomous killing robots are unlikely (Gyrnir).