Most people dumbfound heard of the tranquillity corps. re all toldy a couple of(prenominal) of these people real numberize that there is an anti- tranquility corps sentiment. The pro- tranquility army corps debate is that the US g everyplacenment is offering a valuable serving in ? rotteristing new(prenominal)wise countries in their discipline efforts by providing arrest workers in the fields of education, agriculture, health, trade, technology, and community development.? (? quietude corps?) This design is directed, for the well-nigh part, at recent college graduates. The anti-Peace corps affirmation is that bailiwick service programs ? ar not desireed,? and that the appetency of ?paid volunteers? is an ?oxymoron.? (winter) This argument is directed al close buff uply on members of the Libertarian party. For this analysis I testament be referencing the Peace Corps web rank www.peacecorps.com. The Peace Corps is an organization that sends Ameri tin ass voluntee rs to 74 countries on four contrasting continents. The Peace Corps sh bes with the institution ?America?s most precious resource ? its people.? The website besides says that they atomic number 18 ?devoted to earth peace and friendship.? (Peace Corps) I will alike be devote an bind summarizing the Libertarian semipolitical party?s anti- guinea pig service indicate of view entitled ?What?s Wrong with National mapfulness? by Bill Winter, an editor from the publication LP News. The Libertarian party, a US political party that ?supports the rights of the individual to exercise virtual sole rootity over their knowledge lives, and sets itself against the traditional services and restrictive and coercive powers of federal, state, and local anesthetic governments.? (?Libertarian Party?) The Libertarian party is staunchly against the idea of entirely subject field service including the Peace Corps. The Peace Corps website intakes many magniloquenceal playal manoeuvre s to persuade recent college graduates that ! their come is a worthy iodine. The site?s ethos is mainly plant by the ?.gov? that follows its URL address. watchword is also applied when explaining almost of the ways one shadower profit from volunteering. For example, healthcare benefits: ? encompassing health check amends during service bulk larges 100% of primary quill care, hospitalization, medical evacuation, all prescriptions including rescue control and dental care needs. Volunteers are also cover by workmans compensation for injuries incurred during their period of service,? and ? articulateness in contrary languages, inter matter experience, and cross-cultural understanding are risquely sought-after(prenominal) assets in at onces global economy.? The logic in this is that the psyche will have, according to the site, all medical expenses covered not solo for their period of service provided also for eighteen months after the volunteer has re saturnine. The volunteer will also have the wages of being able to converse confidently in another(prenominal) language; witch is a valued skill amid today?s rapidly globalizing world. This might draw to anyone who has ever wished to require another language or to roughlyone who may have lost a work in the past to someone who is bilingual. and the tactical maneuver employ most often is, by far, that of pathos. The emotional salute is the most obvious choice for a service-based organization?s website. If you are on the Peace Corps website it?s plausibly uninjured to assume that you are toying with the idea of applying. This person, the person who is not quite convinced he/she wants to join, is the person that the website is targeting. In the introduction, ?What is the Peace Corps?? it says ?Peace Corps volunteers continue to serve well unmeasured individuals who want to ramp up a better biography for themselves, their children, and their community.? The said(prenominal) web surfer is going to feel all doting and fuzzy inside, thinking they could be the one to give a better life! to that individual. In addition to many other pathos appeals made throughout the website, there is also a whole section of the site, almost as big as the main site itself, devoted entirely to teens. The appeal habituate in this part of the website is deally pathos based. This section is disagreeable to show teens how cool and fun the Peace Corps croup be. It includes things like music from around the world, easy recipes from other countries, and a ?What?s Your Peace Corps Style?? quiz to severalise you what kind of degree you might want to get in college so you can serve in that field. Seeing as how you have to have a college degree to join up, this is a clear attempt to get a younger wear cheered long before it is time to serve the finding to apply. In accordance with the Libertarian mindset this is a major problem. The rhetorical tactics used in this condition are loosely news; in addition, the author seems to ?reveres? ethos (attempt to discredit the opposing side , or trim the opponent?s ethos.) The topic of the author?s own ethos is not even touched upon because this phrase appeared in a libertarian publication. The author makes an assumptive claim of credibility by record of the fact that he (presumably) shares the same political affiliations as the reader. The use of logos can be seen in all the number and percentages that are given when talking about how ?politicians can?t grasp the notion and Americans don?t need to be bribed or blackmailed into volunteering.? The author states ?that 48% of Americans volunteer each year.? (Winter)The article itself makes reference to rhetoric when talking about prexy Clinton?s encouragement of more volunteerism. Clinton gave a speech in 1997 where he said Americans ?owe a debt of service? and have ?an certificate of indebtedness to give something back to the country and community.
? (qtd in Winter) The article states that his settlement ?eerily echoed the rhetoric of some of autobiography?s belabor despots?, and ?by the late 1990?s such rhetoric had turned into equity.? (Winter) This is in reference to the fact that in parliamentary equity to graduate most high instructs you must now complete a community service requirement. This further backs up the article?s logos that ?Voluntary service programs can be a stepping stone to non-voluntary programs.? (Winter) One major sprain ethos tactic was used while trying to discredit these mandatory cultivate service programs:Ironically, while government schools are busy forcing students to build picnic tables and raise money to buy bulletproof vests for law of nature dogs (both real projects), they are failing i n their primary legation: To educate students. According to the 2000 National Assessment of reading gain ground report, about one of four high school students are functionally illiterate when they graduate. They know how to serve, further not how to read. (Winter)Another reverse ethos tactic used to discredit the supporters of national service was when the author drew a connection in the midst of the current US government and Nazi Germany. This is done by comparing some of the things that volunteerism advocates have said to the Nazi catchword ?Germeinnutz vor Eigennutz? (?The common interest before self.?) That?s a rightfully powerful statement. Winter makes light of the current establishment all throughout his article, referring to them at one point as ?national service cheerleaders.? However this connection with what is considered one of the worst moments in human history may be interpreted as a real stretch and distract his readers. Both sides make excellent use of rhetori cal tactics for their corresponding audiences, but ne! ither one ever targets the opponent?s audience. I believe that the vitrine style Winter writes in, while humorous at times, would deport most people to regard the Libertarians as overly extremum and cause them to move to the pro-national service side. The Peace Corps website on the other hand presents their argument with a direct head. I believe that a Libertarian with a weak resoluteness could be persuaded that national service, or the Peace Corps at the very least, is not so bad after all. plough CitedLibertarian Party. cyclopaedia Britannica. 18 Feb. 2008 . Peace Corps. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. 18 Feb. 2008 . Peace Corps. 18 Feb. 2008 . Winter, Bill. Libertarian Solutions: Whats Wrong with National Service. LP News 20 Jan. 2004. 18 Feb. 2008. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment