Privacy

a ) Companies that provide search engine service to members or to the public must notice exploiter search margin call into question records for two years in case law of nature enforcement agencies or terrorism investigators need themThis is something that is in violation of the intimately to hiding of individuals . The reason for this is that under the law there is an apprehension of privacy and unless there is a warrant nobody is allowed to recover much(prenominal) private information on any public user . The law protects the in good order of an individual to be safe in their persons , houses , s and effects against invasion of privacy .

In displace of this , holding user search inquiry records for two years in case law enforcement agencies or terrorism investigators need them is a violation of this Constitutional provisionIt must be pointed out at this point that when the obligation to maintain user search query records for two years is compel on members this is not a violation of the right to privacy because the company must shop it to them prior to use and they have the right to choose whether or not they waive such right . Prior manifestation and permission given by members is acceptable since these count as willing waivers . On the other hand , if this requirement is enforce upon the unsuspecting general public , the problem is much swell since this is a clear violation of a person s right to privacy under the Constitut ionIn this case , requiring search engine pr! oviders to maintain user...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper